Stelle Inter pudicos barbaros impudici sum...; (De gubernatione dei (439 - 451), Lib. 7, Cap. 6-8 (pp. 88-9, trans. O'Sullivan, pp. 192-4)) [2272]

Basic Information
Keywords
ID 2272
Text De gubernatione dei (439 - 451) Salvian of Marseilles
Quotation Inter pudicos barbaros impudici sumus. Plus adhuc dico: offenduntur barbari ipsi impuritatibus nostris. Esse inter Gothos non licet scortatorem Gothum: soli inter eos praejudicio nationis ac nominis permittuntur impuri esse Romani. Et quae nobis, rogo, spes ante Deum est? Impudicitiam nos diligimus, Gothi exsecrantur; puritatem nos fugimus, illi amant; fornicatio apud illos crimen atque discrimen est, apud nos decus. Et putamus nos ante Deum posse consistere; putamus posse nos salvos esse, quando omne impuritatis scelus, omnis impudicitiae turpitudo a Romanis admittitur et a barbaris vindicatur? Hic nunc illos requiro qui meliores nos putant esse quam barbaros: dicant quid horum vel paucissimi Gothi faciant, vel quid non horum Romani omnes vel pene omnes? Et miramur si terrae vel Aquitanorum vel nostrorum omnium a Deo barbaris datae sunt, cum eas quas Romani polluerant fornicatione, nunc mundent barbari castitate? VII. Sed forte hoc in Aquitanicis tantum? Transeamus etiam ad alias mundi partes, ne de solis tantummodo Gallis dixisse videamur. Quid? Hispanias nonne vel eadem vel majora forsitan vitia perdiderunt? quas quidem coelestis ira etiam si aliis quibuslibet barbaris tradidisset, digna flagitiorum tormenta toleraverunt puritatis inimici. Sed accessit hoc ad manifestandum illic impudicitiae damnationem ut Wandalis potissimum, id est pudicis barbaris traderentur. Dupliciter in illa Hispanorum captivitate ostendere Deus voluit, quantum et odisset carnis libidinem et diligeret castitatem, cum et Wandalos ob solam maxime pudicitiam superponeret, et Hispanos ob solam vel maxime impudicitiam subjugaret. Quid enim? Nunquid non erant in omni orbe terrarum Barbari fortiores, quibus Hispaniae traderentur? Multi absque dubio, immo ni fallor, omnes. Sed ideo ille infirmissimis hostibus cuncta tradidit, ut ostenderet scilicet non vires valere, sed causam; neque nos tunc ignavissimorum quondam hostium fortitudine obrui, sed sola vitiorum nostrorum impuritate superari. Ut vere in nos venerit dictum illud, quo ait Dominus ad Judaeos: Secundum immunditias suas et secundum iniquitates suas feci illis, et averti faciem meam ab eis. Et alibi ad gentem ipsam: Adducet Dominus super te gentem de longinquo: et ungulis, inquit, equorum suorum omnes plateas tuas conculcabunt, et populum tuum gladio interficient. Completa ergo in nos sunt omnia quae dixit sermo divinus, et vim verborum coelestium luit poena cunctorum. VIII. Sed tamen cum omnes fere barbarae gentes Romanorum sanguinem biberint, omnes viscera nostra laceraverint; quid est quod Deus noster maximas rei publicae opes et locupletissimos Romani nominis populos in jus potissimum ignavissimorum quondam hostium dedit? Quid? nisi ut agnosceremus scilicet quod supra dixi, meritorum hoc fuisse, non virium, utque ipsum hoc nobis in confusionem caderet ac poenam quod ignavissimis traderemur, et vel sic plagam coelestis manus agnosceremus agnosceremus quia nos non fortissimi hostium sed ignauissimi subiugarent.
Translation Among chaste barbarians, we are unchaste. I say further: the very barbarians are offended by our impurities. Fornication of Goths is not lawful among the Goths. Only the Romans living among them can afford to be impure by prerogative of nation and name. I ask: What hope is there for us before God? We love impurity; the Goths abominate it. We flee from purity; they seek it. Fornication among them is a crime; with us a distinction and an ornament. Do we think that we can face God, do we think that we can be saved, when every crime of impurity, every base and shameful act, is committed by the Romans and censured by the barbarians? Here and now I ask them who think we are better than the barbarians: Tell me which of these vices is committed even by a very few Goths, or which of them is not committed by the Romans or by nearly all Romans? And we wonder when the soil of the Aquitainians, or all of our own is given by God to the barbarians, since the barbarians are now cleansing by chastity those lands which the Romans polluted by fornication. (7) Perhaps, this was the case in Aquitaine only. Let me cross over to other parts of the world, lest I seem to give all my attention to Gaul. Have not the same or perhaps greater vices destroyed Spain? Indeed, even if the heavenly anger had handed Spain over to any barbarian tribe, the enemies of purity there would have suffered tortures worthy of their crimes. But in addition, for a manifest condemnation of impurity that country was delivered to the Vandals, that is, to the most chaste among the barbarians. By the captivity of the Spaniards, God wished to show in two ways how much He hated carnal lewdness and loved chastity, when He put the Vandals in command solely on ac- count of their great chastity and subjugated the Spaniards solely on account of their great impurity. Why did God act thus? Were there not in the whole world stronger barbarians to whom the Spaniards might be delivered? Doubtless, there were many stronger. Indeed, if I am not mistaken, all were stronger. God gave all to the weakest enemies to show that it was not the strength of numbers but the cause that conquered. He wished to show that neither are we being overthrown by the valor of our former slothful foes but we are right now being overcome solely by the impurity of our vices, so that that saying which the Lord said to the Jews may come home to us: 'According to their uncleanliness and according to their iniquities have I done unto them, and I have turned away My face from them.' Elsewhere, He said to the same people: 'The Lord shall bring a people over you from afar' and 'He said, "with the hoofs of their horses they shall tread your streets and they shall kill your people with the sword." ' Everything spoken of by the Divine Word is fulfilled in us, and the punishment of all has fulfilled the force of the heavenly words. (8) Since almost all barbarian nations have drunk Roman blood and torn apart our bowels, why is it that our God delivered the wealthiest State and the richest" people who bear the Roman name to the most potent jurisdiction of enemies who were once most cowardly? Why? Unless that we may acknowledge, as I have said above, that it was a question of merit not of strength. Also that the fact of being handed over to the most craven would add to our confusion and punishment. Also that the fact of being subjected, not by the bravest, but by the most cowardly of the enemy, would compel us to acknowledge the blow of the heavenly hand.
Quotation source Lib. 7, Cap. 6-8 (pp. 88-9, trans. O'Sullivan, pp. 192-4)
Temporal Coverage 439 - 451
Associated use case(s)
Spatial Coverage Objects
Comment